[NTLUG:Discuss] Re: More about kernel recompiling.
Scott Denlinger
sbd at dakotacom.net
Mon Aug 19 23:04:50 CDT 2002
>
>
>But were there any modules that (1) you wanted to load, (2) you hadn't
>built into the kernel, but had built as modules, and (3) you couldn't
>load?
>
Basically, no. When I first recompiled a plain 2.4.18 kernel, I was
under the impression that I should build things into the kernel, rather
than build them as modules. So I had a lot of things "hardwired" in, and
very few modules. I have since learned that this isn't necessarily
always a good thing. My biggest problem when I attempted my kernel
compile was that things that I *wasn't* compiling as modules weren't
getting recognized at bootup. I am thinking specifically of the kernel
support for my two NICs. The default kernel had them compiled as
modules. I thought they should be part of the kernel, but the recompiled
kernel didn't load them. So since I hadn't specified that they be
compiled as modules, I didn't assume that I should treat them as
modules. Was this wrong? Even after I loaded *all* the modules I
compiled, my NICs weren't functional. Maybe this is a sign that the
problem never was a module problem to begin with, but something else.
Scott Denlinger
More information about the Discuss
mailing list