[NTLUG:Discuss] OT printer carrier sheet question

[Greg Edwards]

At one time I used Quicken check writer with sheets of checks.  What 
they had was a sheet with a sticky strip on the top of the page.  If you 
had a less than full sheet you stick the first check at the top of the 
page so it lined up correctly.  IIRC there was a sticky strip where the 
last check (bottom) would get held in place too.

Greg Edwards
http://greg.edwards-tx.us

On 1/6/2015 8:53 AM, Fred James wrote:
> Leroy Tennison wrote:
>> Doesn't it have an envelope feeder?  Can't you use it?  If so I will
>> warn you that Apache OpenOffice has a bug printing #10 envelopes. The
>> trick to get it to work is under Format->Page, you have to change the
>> text direction to "Right-to-left Vertical".  Test with regular paper
>> before wasting check stock.
>>
>> On 01/05/2015 03:25 PM, Fred James wrote:
>>> OT printer carrier sheet question
>>>
>>> My checks are too small to go through my printer (HP LJ 4M+) on their
>>> own.  Does anyone know of a carrier sheet, or other "trick" to get a
>>> small sheet through the printer?
>>> Thank you
>>> Regards
>>> Fred James
> Leroy Tennison
> Thank you for your reply ... and the tip on the Apache OpenOffice bug,
> which seems to have been carried over into LibreOffice as well ... I
> shall try that out.
>
> Unfortunately, while the printer does have a manual feed with envelope
> guide, the minimum size media is 3.5x6.5 inches, and the checks are
> 2,75x6.25 inches ... too small in each direction.
>
> I am working (as a work around) at developing a carrier out of a sheet
> of 8.5x11 overhead transparency stock ... positioning and holding the
> check in slots cut through the clear stock.  So far I have one long slot
> at the feed end to hold the leading edge of the check, and I am now
> going to add a couple of small diagonal slots to hold the tail end (keep
> it aligned properly ... the single head slot doesn't quite do the
> alignment part.  Not magic, but I hope it works ... more testing ahead.
> Regards
> Fred James
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> http://www.ntlug.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss