Recent Changes - Search:


Linux is free.
Life is good.

Linux Training
10am on Meeting Days!

King of Glory Lutheran Church

Do a presentation at NTLUG.

What is the Linux Installation Project?

Real companies using Linux!

Not just for business anymore.

Providing ready to run platforms on Linux

Digg it here

Logical Volume Manager - LVM

Partitions, Slices and Frustration

When you think about storage, generally we think of things like disks, driver letters, filesystems and partitions. Typically a disk is broken up into areas called partitions (or slices) and each partition can be dedicated to some kind of storage purpose such as holding a fileystem or swap area. While this is easy and straight forward for most, it can be very frustrating when a partition is out of space or you want to reorganize data or even replace a hard drive.

Partitioning usually means setting the beginning and ending points on a hard drive for an area of storage. This can cause issues since usually partitions are placed one after the other on the hard drive. Why is this a problem? Consider a drive with two partitions. If you wanted to expand the first partition somehow, you are probably looking at destroying the following partition to accomplish the task.

Did you know...

Sun Solaris 8 could only handle disks up to 1TB in size! Even in Solaris 9, handling disks larger than 1TB required using a different partition label which caused some packages to break. Solaris 8 is still one of the most widely deployed versions of Solaris.

Large disk and partition handling is not a problem that is unique to Linux. In fact, Linux distributions were solving the problem before many commercial Unix's did.

Another problems with partitions is that the old style DOS partition table is alive and well for most computer users. This means that you only have 4 primary partitions. Fortunately, there is already a standard for taking a primary partition and turning it into an extended partition which can contain more partitions. Even so, you are limited to maximum number of partitions which could be as few as 15 (e.g. SCSI).

Maximum size of a partition is usually limited to 2TB. While this seems like a lot of storage, with newer disk technologies becoming so affordable, large multi-terabyte storage has already invaded corporate America and the pricing makes is practical for home use as well. To solve the problem, there are multiple standards for an updated partition table (e.g. GPT/GUID). However, many systems will not know what to do with the different partition table and might not be able to boot off it.

Moving data (e.g. filesystems) around from partition to partition, disk to disk, can be a time consuming task which requires a temporary storage area (e.g. tape backup or other disk) to aid with the task.

Partitions are essentially statically defined areas of a disk that are used for storage. Because of their static nature they do not lend themselves well to the rapid changing environment of today's enterprise businesses.


Using a Redundant Array of Independent Disks can be a somewhat flexible solution for storage. Some standalone hardware subsystems can present volumes of data to devices and in some cases can avoid some of the problems with partitioning. However, in general, RAID only makes the problem worse since disks become larger and limitations with common partition tables prevent the creation of large areas for use as filesystem space.


Storage Area Networks also provide flexibility in enterprise storage. With disk storage on a SAN, new volumes of storage can be made available dynamically. This allows a machine with visibility to a newly created storage area to use that area without necessarily rebooting. A problem can occur when making new drives visible dynamically in that the device names that a client host might use could change as new disks come in and out of view. Some planning is required to use persistent device names (where supported) in order to enjoy the flexibility of SAN storage.

However, while it provides a means for isolating storage visibility and provides the idea of dynamically adding storage to devices, SAN disk units do not solve the fundamental problems of current partitioning technologies.

Old Style Linux Storage

On a Linux host, disks are given device names like /dev/hda, /dev/hdb or /dev/sda, /dev/sdb, /dev/sdc... The problem with using such device names is that the order of the devices may change depending on how disks are connected to their bus.

For example, if we have a machine with two SCSI drives, Linux will identify the two drives as /dev/sda and /dev/sdb. But, if we add additional disks, depending on where (which SCSI id) they are placed inside of the SCSI bus or what controller is used, the naming of devices may change, forcing potentially an emergency repair situation in order make things right.

    DISK1 ------>   /dev/sda
    DISK2 ------>   /dev/sdb

    DISK1 ------->  /dev/sda
    NEW DISK ---->  /dev/sdb
    DISK2 ------->  /dev/sdc

Red Hat combated this problem at the filesystem level by creating a special option on the ext2 filesystem called a LABEL. You can set the LABEL when a filesystem is created or with a tool after creation. Thus in your /etc/fstab, instead of using the device name (which may change), you used the LABEL= feature to allow searching for the filesystem that matches the label requested. However, this feature was limited to ext2 at the time. The solution is on the right path though. There needs to be a way of abstracting the device (filesystem) so that dynamic changes can be handled without a lot of repair work.

Example /etc/fstab entry using LABEL=:

 LABEL=/                   /            ext3    defaults        1 1

Better Linux Storage

In newer versions of Linux (somewhere early in 2.6), persistent names became available for storage devices. You can find the names under /dev/disk (by-id, by-path or by-uuid). This means we can replace the not so static device names in /etc/fstab with persistent names.

Example /etc/fstab entry using persistent partition name:

 /dev/disk/by-id/ata-Maxtor_6B300R0_BZZ1155-part1 / ext3 defaults 1 1

This is better than using LABEL= since no filesystem feature is needed. Thus any filesystem can be mounted this way and not worry about LABEL= support or changes to actual device names.

If you are working with SANs or just in general, using persistent names can prevent you from having to do additional work if you are adding and/or subtracting drives to your system.

Even so, not ALL storage devices are known by the standard Linux drivers (e.g. proprietary storage controllers) and therefore, there is no guarantee that you can use persistent storage device names in every situation.

Even Better Linux Storage (LVM)

In the late 1990's, there was a considerable difference between Red Hat and SuSE. SuSE was trying very hard to provide a Unix-like world for their customer base. This would help ease migration from commercial Unix platforms like HPUX, AIX and Solaris. A new filesystem brought journaling to Linux. That filesystem was reiserfs. SuSE began delivering reiserfs (beta) with version 6.3 of their product. SuSE also was looking at Sistina's LVM (Logical Volume Manager). SuSE decided to included reiserfs and LVM as a part of their distribution. This provided the first enterprise level storage management in Linux. With that said, Alan Cox (Red Hat) was credited with the effort of getting LVM into the mainline kernel tree. LVM is used by almost all Linux distributions today including both SUSE Linux Enterprise Server (since SLES 7 2001) and Red Hat Enterprise Linux (since RHEL 3 2003).

Are You Kidding??

Ironically, it was not Novell/SUSE that acquired Sistina, but Red Hat. This was good news for Red Hat since they were still rather new to the idea of flexible storage solutions using LVM. Even so, the SUSE team has been using it for a much longer period of time (3 years longer) and unlike Red Hat, they used it in combination with a filesystem (reiserfs) that worked dynamically in conjunction with it.

As both Red Hat and SUSE begin delivering enterprise level distributions with longer support, SUSE's inclusion of LVM early on made SUSE a better fit for the enterprise, even though Red Hat (due to IPO exuberance) became synonymous with Linux in the USA.

Using LVM, device names become irrelevant. Once a partition OR whole disk is placed under LVM control, the management of storage areas is handled in an abstract manner without using fixed device names. So finally, we have a fairly generic abstraction mechanism that allows us to access storage with persistent names in almost all cases. So, even though things like /dev/disk persistent device naming came AFTER LVM, LVM is actually the better solution in most storage cases and SUSE has been using it since 1999!

Physical Volumes

An LVM Physical Volume is a disk or partition that can be used by LVM. This is the lowest level of LVM association. To make a disk or partition usable by LVM you use the pvcreate command followed by the block disk device or partition to use.

 # pvcreate /dev/sdb /dev/sdd1

You can place any valid block storage device under LVM control. This includes whole disks, partitions, multi-disk (software RAID) devices. For some strange reason, Red Hat believes that using whole disks as PVs is dangerous because you might plug the disk into a system that does not understand LVM and it may allocate and write over the top of it. However, the benefits of using the whole disk far outweigh the potential of data corruption caused by doing something that could only be classified as bizarre (if not insane).

To locate all PVs on a system use the pvscan command. The pvscan program scans all available block storage devices for LVM PVs.

 # pvscan
  PV /dev/sda5   VG leviathan   lvm2 [200.00 GB / 65.00 GB free]
  PV /dev/sdb                   lvm2 [250.00 GB]
  PV /dev/sdd1                  lvm2 [200.00 GB]
  Total: 3 [650.00 GB] / in use: 1 [200.00 GB] / in no VG: 2 [450.00 GB]

Specifics about a particular PV can be viewed using the pvdisplay utility.

 # pvdisplay /dev/sdd1
  --- NEW Physical volume ---
  PV Name               /dev/sdd1
  VG Name
  PV Size               200.00 GB
  Allocatable           NO
  PE Size (KByte)       0
  Total PE              0
  Free PE               0
  Allocated PE          0
  PV UUID               NkQa7Z-eFM0-vke6-3Z3g-DsP1-R5dM-QUjBsL

A newer utility called pvs can be used to create formatted output of all PVs on a system and includes the information that you could get by using a combination of pvscan and pvdisplay. You can use pvs to create a comma separated view of the data for example.

 # pvs --separator , --noheadings

 # pvs -v
    Scanning for physical volume names
    Wiping cache of LVM-capable devices
  PV         VG        Fmt  Attr PSize   PFree   DevSize PV UUID                
  /dev/sda5  leviathan lvm2 a-   200.00G  65.00G 200.01G 04sZ5x-bYq8-...
  /dev/sdb             lvm2 --   250.00G 250.00G 250.00G rmn0f0-s9ln-...
  /dev/sdd1            lvm2 --   200.00G 200.00G 200.00G NkQa7Z-eFM0-...

Some distributions have special utilities to work with LVM. The openSUSE distribution has YaST. Please note that these special administration utilities have limitations. For example, SUSE's YaST does not understand how to put a full disk under LVM control. That is a huge limitation given the partitioning conundrum discussed here.

Accept No Imitations...

Sistina's LVM command set in Linux is patterned after the Logical Volume Manager found in HP-UX. In general Sistina's LVM is a superset of what HP used. However it does differ slightly. But in general, if you learn the command line syntax for manipulating LVM in Linux, you are well prepared to handle LVM's in HP-UX.

Volume Groups

An LVM Volume Group (VG) establishes a named pool of PVs that can be used like a logical disk.

 # vgcreate mytestvg /dev/sdb /dev/sdd1

Just like PVs, we can use vgscan to scan for all VGs on the system, vgdisplay to see specific information for a VG and vgs as a contemporary replacement for both.

 # vgs
  VG        #PV #LV #SN Attr   VSize   VFree
  leviathan   1   3   0 wz--n- 200.00G  65.00G
  mytestvg    2   0   0 wz--n- 449.99G 449.99G

If you need to add additional PV's to an exiting VG, you can use vgextend. It is very easy to add space to your pool of PV's.

 # pvcreate /dev/sdc
 # vgextend mytestvg /dev/sdc
  Volume group "mytestvg" successfully extended

Logical Volumes

An LVM Logical Volume (LV) is the equivalent of a partition in the old vernacular. LVs are created inside of a VG and usually an LV is what you will format with a filesystem for mounting. Similar to PVs and VGs, there is a lvcreate command where you specify the name of the LV, its size and the VG to use. An LV is a logical slice of data taken from one or more PV's inside of a VG.

For example to create a new LV called "lv1" with a 10G size out of the mytestvg VG:

 # lvcreate -n lv1 -L 10G mytestvg
  Logical volume "lv1" created

Also, just like the other elements of LVM, there is a lvscan, lvdisplay and lvs set of utilities.

 # lvs
  LV        VG        Attr   LSize  Origin Snap%  Move Log Copy%
  isos      leviathan -wi-ao 35.00G
  localhome leviathan -wi-ao 40.00G
  vmware    leviathan -wi-ao 60.00G
  lv1       mytestvg  -wi-a- 10.00G

Again, typically you would create a filesystem on a newly created LV.

 # mkfs.ext3 /dev/mytestvg/lv1
 mke2fs 1.39 (29-May-2006)
 Filesystem label=
 OS type: Linux
 Block size=4096 (log=2)
 Fragment size=4096 (log=2)
 1310720 inodes, 2621440 blocks
 131072 blocks (5.00%) reserved for the super user
 First data block=0
 Maximum filesystem blocks=2684354560
 80 block groups
 32768 blocks per group, 32768 fragments per group
 16384 inodes per group
 Superblock backups stored on blocks:
        32768, 98304, 163840, 229376, 294912, 819200, 884736, 1605632

 Writing inode tables: done
 Creating journal (32768 blocks): done
 Writing superblocks and filesystem accounting information: done

 This filesystem will be automatically checked every 39 mounts or
 180 days, whichever comes first.  Use tune2fs -c or -i to override.

Then you can create a normal mount point directory and add the following to your /etc/fstab so you can mount the new LV:

 /dev/mytestvg/lv1 /lv1 ext3 acl,user_xattr 1 2
 # mkdir /lv1
 # mount /lv1
 # df -h /lv1
 Filesystem            Size  Used Avail Use% Mounted on
                      9.9G  151M  9.2G   2% /lv1

In LVM2 (second version of LVM in Linux), LVM2 makes use of something called the Device Mapper. This is why when we do the df -h /lv1 above we see /dev/mapper/mytestvg-lv1 instead of the expected /dev/mytestvg/lv1. However, you can refer to the LV using the latter (just as we did in our /etc/fstab above).

Resizing Logical Volumes and Filesystems

In addition to getting around maximum parition size, LVM is useful for creating areas of storage that can easily be resized. LVs can be grown or reduced. If you grow an LV, you can later grow the underlying filesystem to fill it. If you want to reduce an LV size, you must first shrink the filesystem and then you can reduce the LV. Just make sure to shrink the filesystem by a little bit more than you will shrink the LV. After all, you can fill the gap by expanding the filesystem to fill that later.

An LV can be extended using lvextend. An LV can be reduced by using lvreduce.

 # lvextend -L +10G /dev/mytestvg/lv1
  Extending logical volume lv1 to 20.00 GB
  Logical volume lv1 successfully resized

Once an LV has been grown in size, you will have to somehow tell the filesystem to make use of the additional space. Just growing an LV does not make the storage available for files and directories.

Resizing Ext3

The program to resize the ext3 (or ext2) filesystem is resize2fs. By default, with no arguments, it will resize the filesystem to fill the entire space of the underlying device (which in our case is an LV).

 # lvextend -L +10G /dev/mytestvg/lv1
  Extending logical volume lv1 to 20.00 GB
  Logical volume lv1 successfully resized

 # resize2fs /dev/mytestvg/lv1
 resize2fs 1.39 (29-May-2006)
 Filesystem at /dev/mytestvg/lv1 is mounted on /lv1; on-line resizing required
 Performing an on-line resize of /dev/mytestvg/lv1 to 5242880 (4k) blocks.
 The filesystem on /dev/mytestvg/lv1 is now 5242880 blocks long.

Took about 9 seconds. Not bad. The question is, will it take longer if we increase the amount of growth?

 # lvextend -L +50G /dev/mytestvg/lv1
  Extending logical volume lv1 to 70.00 GB
  Logical volume lv1 successfully resized

 # resize2fs /dev/mytestvg/lv1
 resize2fs 1.39 (29-May-2006)
 Filesystem at /dev/mytestvg/lv1 is mounted on /lv1; on-line resizing required
 Performing an on-line resize of /dev/mytestvg/lv1 to 18350080 (4k) blocks.
 The filesystem on /dev/mytestvg/lv1 is now 18350080 blocks long.

Took about 40 seconds.

Why is the amount of time important? Consider the case where a program is generating logging data at a rapid pace. For example, you notice that you will exhaust your filesystem space is about 30 seconds. Depending on the amount of space needed, the time to complete the task can be critical. In the example above, you will not be able to resize the area fast enough.

Also, note that an older ext3 filesystem may have great difficulty in being grown. The author of ext2online says that unless the filesystem is properly prepared, older ext3 filesystems will be greatly limited by the amount of space they can be grown. This has to do with the block sizes used by ext3 at creation time. Because disks have become larger and for performance reasons, newer systems will create ext3 filesystem with a larger block size (4k is the new default) and growing the filesystem can be done easily. If you do not know, you can unmount the filesystem and run the ext2prepare program to ensure that your ext3 filesystem can be grown safely.

Resizing Reiserfs

Reiserfs is often considered the more controversial filesystem (when compared to ext3). However, reiserfs has always been easier to resize and had this feature before ext3 even existed. One key advantage to reiserfs resizing is that the operation is almost instantaneous, even for fairly large size resizing. This can be a differentiator depending on your data storage needs. For reiserfs, you use the resize_reiserfs command to resize it.

 # lvextend -L +50G /dev/mytestvg/lv1
  Extending logical volume lv1 to 70.00 GB
  Logical volume lv1 successfully resized

 # resize_reiserfs /dev/mytestvg/lv1
 resize_reiserfs 3.6.19 (2003

 resize_reiserfs: On-line resizing finished successfully.

Took 2 seconds to resize the reiserfs area vs. 40 seconds for ext3. Just something to bear in mind.


Sometimes you need a filesystem to remain static (read-only) for purposes like doing a backup of the filesystem. The reason is that modifications to the filesystem while a backup is taking place could create some inconsistencies on a restore. However, keeping everyone off of a filesystem is very inconvenient. This is where snapshots come to the rescue.

A snapshot is a static image of a filesystem in time. Modifications to the actual filesystem will not affect the snapshot image. For all practical purposes though, the snapshot looks like a filesystem. A snapshot is a special form of Logical Volume. You use lvcreate with the -s option. This may seem confusing, but a snapshot requires space. Consider a snapshotted filesystem where the original filesystem contained a large file of 20G. If the file is removed in the actual filesystem, we want the snapshot to have enough space to contain the file since it was present at the time of the snapshot.

 # lvcreate -L 30G -s -n lv1-snap /dev/mytestvg/lv1
  Logical volume "lv1-snap" created

Assuming our lv1 filesystem is already mounted, we'll mount our lv1-snap volume as well (Notice: we did not have to create the filesystem on the snapshot volume, it is a logical replica of the original volume, filesystem and all).

 # mkdir /lv1-snap
 # mount /dev/mytestvg/lv1-snap /lv1-snap
 # ls /lv1-snap
 file1.txt  file2.txt
 # ls /lv1
 file1.txt  file2.txt

You can see that the two mounted areas look the same currently. But if we make some changes to the filesystem at lv1...

 # touch /lv1/file3.txt
 # rm /lv1/file1.txt
 # ls /lv1
 file2.txt  file3.txt
 # ls /lv1-snap
 file1.txt  file2.txt

A snapshot only holds the data of the differences between it and the original LV. And, just to confuse things more, you CAN manipulate the snapshot volume as well. You need to remember that a snapshot needs to have enough space to hold the differences. But, since a snapshot is just a special LV, it can be extended using lvextend just like a normal LV. Just try to remember that a snapshot is NOT a true volume. It's logical size is the same as the LV being snapshotted, the space you add to snapshot volume is merely for recording differences.

How much space should you allocate to a snapshot LV? Depends. It depends on how long the snapshot is going to be around. For example, if you know that on a weekly basis a particular filesystem has data changes amounting to less than 30%, then you guess that your snapshot size should be roughly 30% of the original LV. But if for some reason you need the snapshot longer than one week, you could well run out of space on the snapshot LV. Snapshots are usually done for the purpose of making a backup. Once the backup is complete, the snapshot LV can be destroyed.

You can destroy the snapshot LV with lvremove when finished (just make sure it is unmounted).

 # umount /lv1-snap
 # lvremove /dev/mytestvg/lv1-snap
 Do you really want to remove active logical volume "lv1-snap"? [y/n]: y
  Logical volume "lv1-snap" successfully removed

Moving Stuff Around

Using LVM allows you the flexibility of moving VG's from system to system as well as removing PV's from a VG.

Moving Data Off of a PV

One huge benefit of the abstraction of LVM is that you can move data off of a PV so that it can be removed safely. For example, if you know that you have a drive that is failing, you can use pvmove to move all data off of that drive onto free areas from other PV's inside the same VG.

In the example below, notice that only /dev/sdb has any data in use by LV's in our mytestvg VG.

 # pvscan
  PV /dev/sdb    VG mytestvg    lvm2 [250.00 GB / 180.00 GB free]
  PV /dev/sdd1   VG mytestvg    lvm2 [200.00 GB / 200.00 GB free]
  PV /dev/sda5   VG leviathan   lvm2 [200.00 GB / 65.00 GB free]
  Total: 3 [650.00 GB] / in use: 3 [650.00 GB] / in no VG: 0 [0   ]

But if /dev/sdb is failing or having errors, we can tell the system to move all data off of that PV and onto other PV's inside the same VG.

 # pvmove -v /dev/sdb
    Wiping cache of LVM-capable devices
    Finding volume group "mytestvg"
    Archiving volume group "mytestvg" metadata (seqno 34).
    Creating logical volume pvmove0
    Executing: /sbin/modprobe dm-mirror
    Moving 17920 extents of logical volume mytestvg/lv1
    Found volume group "mytestvg"
    Updating volume group metadata
    Creating volume group backup "/etc/lvm/backup/mytestvg" (seqno 35).
    Found volume group "mytestvg"
    Found volume group "mytestvg"
    Suspending mytestvg-lv1 (253:0)
    Found volume group "mytestvg"
    Creating mytestvg-pvmove0
    Loading mytestvg-pvmove0 table
    Resuming mytestvg-pvmove0 (253:4)
    Found volume group "mytestvg"
    Loading mytestvg-pvmove0 table
    Resuming mytestvg-pvmove0 (253:4)
    Loading mytestvg-lv1 table
    Resuming mytestvg-lv1 (253:0)
    Checking progress every 15 seconds
  /dev/sdb: Moved: 0.6%
  /dev/sdb: Moved: 1.3%
  /dev/sdb: Moved: 1.8%
  /dev/sdb: Moved: 2.2%
  /dev/sdb: Moved: 2.7%
  /dev/sdb: Moved: 3.2%


  /dev/sdb: Moved: 99.3%
  /dev/sdb: Moved: 99.8%
  /dev/sdb: Moved: 100.0%
    Found volume group "mytestvg"
    Found volume group "mytestvg"
    Loading mytestvg-lv1 table
    Suspending mytestvg-lv1 (253:0)
    Suspending mytestvg-pvmove0 (253:4)
    Found volume group "mytestvg"
    Found volume group "mytestvg"
    Found volume group "mytestvg"
    Resuming mytestvg-pvmove0 (253:4)
    Found volume group "mytestvg"
    Resuming mytestvg-lv1 (253:0)
    Found volume group "mytestvg"
    Removing mytestvg-pvmove0 (253:4)
    Found volume group "mytestvg"
    Removing temporary pvmove LV
    Writing out final volume group after pvmove
    Creating volume group backup "/etc/lvm/backup/mytestvg" (seqno 37).

The -v option to the pvmove command shows us information about what it is doing and gives us a percentage complete running status. As you can see above, with status checks every 15 seconds, it will take a while to move all of the data off of /dev/sdb and onto other free PV's (e.g. /dev/sdd1).

A pvmove actually does a data copy first to the other PV's. This is done for safety. If something were to happen and your machine were to crash or get interrupted in the process, just typing pvmove by itself when you boot back up will continue where it left off with any moves that were active at the time of the crash. Also, you can choose to interrupt the move and abort it by issuing pvmove --abort.

If you do a pvscan (or pvs) while the move is happening, you'll see that the area on the other free PV's is preallocated for the move. So even while the move is in progress you'll see that the whole amount of data for the move has been set aside from the free PV areas.

In the example below, /dev/sdd1 is now showing ~70GB used, just like /dev/sdb.

 # pvscan
  PV /dev/sdb    VG mytestvg    lvm2 [250.00 GB / 180.00 GB free]
  PV /dev/sdd1   VG mytestvg    lvm2 [200.00 GB / 130.00 GB free]
  PV /dev/sda5   VG leviathan   lvm2 [200.00 GB / 65.00 GB free]
  Total: 3 [650.00 GB] / in use: 3 [650.00 GB] / in no VG: 0 [0   ]

When the pvmove is complete though, we see:

 # pvscan
  PV /dev/sdb    VG mytestvg    lvm2 [250.00 GB / 250.00 GB free]
  PV /dev/sdd1   VG mytestvg    lvm2 [200.00 GB / 130.00 GB free]
  PV /dev/sda5   VG leviathan   lvm2 [200.00 GB / 65.00 GB free]
  Total: 3 [650.00 GB] / in use: 3 [650.00 GB] / in no VG: 0 [0   ]

We can now remove /dev/sdb from our mytestvg VG.

 # vgreduce mytestvg /dev/sdb
  Removed "/dev/sdb" from volume group "mytestvg"
 # pvs
  PV         VG        Fmt  Attr PSize   PFree
  /dev/sda5  leviathan lvm2 a-   200.00G  65.00G
  /dev/sdb             lvm2 --   250.00G 250.00G
  /dev/sdd1  mytestvg  lvm2 a-   200.00G 130.00G

Now /dev/sdb is a PV that is not associated with any VG. If we want, we can reassign the unused PV to a different VG or we can do a pvremove to remove the LVM meta-data on a system with hotpluggable drives in order to remove the drive. Can you see the advantage of using a whole drive for a PV? In the case of /dev/sdd1, if we start seeing failures on that device, we might not be able to remove the disk if (for example) other partitions are used outside of LVM from that same drive.

 # pvremove /dev/sdb
  Labels on physical volume "/dev/sdb" successfully wiped

... and we then pull the drive.

AND... we did all of this while /dev/mytestvg/lv1 was mounted!

Exporting Volume Groups

If you want to remove disks from one machine and plug them into another without losing the data, you can use vgexport to change the active state of a VG and prepare it for removal. I have not tried this feature yet. But you can use vgimport to import the VG once all of the PV's have been physically moved to the different system. Obviously, this is NOT a feature you can use while LV's of the target VG are actively mounted.

Extra Wisdom

  1. The snapshot mechanism inside LVM2 is fragile. Do not depend too much on this feature. It can be useful for short duration things, but try not to get too fancy.
  2. I recommend using whole disks as PV's. I do not support the idea of using a broad mixture of block devices (e.g. combining partitions, software raid devices, whole disks) inside of a single VG. The more complicated you make it, the more likely that a small problem will turn into a BIG problem.
  3. Do not put /boot or / inside of LVM. Most do not like the latter, however, your / filesystem should be quite small in Linux. Unlike many commercial Unix variants, Linux does allow you to have a very, very small / filesystem (e.g. 300M or even less). /boot cannot be inside of LVM today.
  4. Invest in SAN storage. A good SAN storaage array will net you a flexible, growable infrastructure with RAID and performance that cannot be matched by most internal disk configurations.
  5. Use "partitioning." What I mean is that you should have separate filesystem for critical areas so that you can isolate areas from each other (a full filesystem shouldn't bring everything down) for space and security reasons. For example, separate /, /boot, /usr, /var, /opt, /usr/local, /home, /tmp. On a single drive system, I create /, /boot and swap on 3 primary partitions, then create an extended partition totally allocated to LVM usage carving out LVs for the rest of the areas.... and think small. It's pretty easy to grow ext3 and/or reiserfs. By not allocating all of your disk up front, you have more flexibility down the road when storage needs arise.
  6. Use LVM on top of RAID LVM is not RAID. While there is simple mirroring available with LVM, it is better to build LVM's on top of already RAID'd disks. Also, LVM does support some striping, again, let the underlying RAID handle striping.
Page last modified on July 30, 2008, at 01:41 PM